Factors Contributing to Crimes Related to Privatization

Document Type : Scientific Research

Authors

1 Ph.D. Student in Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law and Political Science, Azad University, Research Sciences Branch, Tehran, Iran.

2 Assistant Professor of Criminal Law and Criminology, Faculty of Law, Azad University, Research Sciences Branch, Tehran, Iran.

3 Associate Professor of Private Law, Faculty of Law, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch, Tabriz, Iran.

Abstract

Privatization is the granting of the public sector to the private sector. Privatization strengthens the activities of commercial companies and shapes commercial competition, which is one of the most important influences of privatization. Privatization is a fundamental value for the economy of a society and even beyond that it is necessary for its existence and survival. This fundamental value, as it is a method against corruption, monopoly and anti- competitive and anti- market measures, can be threatened by criminal behavior. It is clear that threatening behaviors are not carried out against the entity of privatization; Rather, it deviates it from the legal and correct path, which results in privatization, however, corruption and monopolization do not disappear either. The purpose of this research is the etiology of crimes caused by privatization. The research method is descriptive and analytical. The findings indicate that the lack of transparency of laws،diversity of views and the lack of supervision in the period before and after the transfer, are the main reasons for the crimes caused by privatization. As a result, monitoring the transferred companies and evaluating their performance is considered as one of the important and inseparable steps in the privatization process and is one of the most important programs of the privatization organization in the post- transfer phase. Of course, after the executive process of the transfer of companies, supervision is the most important factor in the correct completion of the transfer process. Based on this, monitoring the activities of entrusted economic centers and

Keywords

Main Subjects


Ackemon Roso, Corruption, Astudyin poliricul Econo, Y. (1978). Americanpoliticul science Review. Vol. 61. No 2.
Bakhtiarzadeh, Mohammad Javad. (2016). “supervision and control and its stages in management”. Nakhel Shahdad (Management in Islam), No. 9, pp. 5-8 (in Persian(.
Dadgar, Hassan; Massouminia, Gholamali. (2007). Financial corruption. Tehran: Young Thought Cente. (in Persian(.
Filipovic, A. (2005). “Impact of privatization on economic growth”. Undergraduate Economic Review, Vol. 2, No. 1.
Faruzandeh, Lotf-Allah. (2016). “Monitoring and Control in Islamic Management”. Majlis and Research Quarterly, No. 53, pp. 55-86 (in Persian(.
Haqiqat Jo, Mehdi. (1400). “The procedure for dealing with anti-commercial interactions and the effective way to deal with them”. Legal Studies Quarterly, 13. 9, pp. 65-96 (in Persian(.
Jafari, Mojtabi. (2012). Sociology of Criminal Law, Economic Approach to Criminal Law. Tehran: Mizan Publishing House (in Persian(.
Jalilund, Mohammad; Gurji Azqadriani, Ali Akbar. (2019). “Supervision of the constitutional body on the transparency of laws”. A comparative study of Iran's Guardian Council and Germany's Constitutional Court, Public Law Studies, 50 (40), pp. 1525-1544 (in Persian.(
Jalali, Hossein; Rahgosha, Amirhossein; Pak Nihad, Amir. (2019). “Legal Criminal Policy Strategies in Support of Privatization and Economic Development”. Scientific Quarterly Journal of Political Sociology of Iran, 3 (3), pp.  1104 -1087 (in Persian(.
Khandan, Abbas. (2016). “Privatization: A Historical View of Iran's Experience”. Political-Economic Information, No 302, pp. 190-201 (in Persian(.
Mahdavipour, Azam. (2015). Differential criminal policy in pen and economic crime. Tehran: Mizan publication (in Persian(.
Mirzaei Monfared, Gholam Ali. (2012). “Analysis of the crime of misuse of final information in the securities market”. Criminal Law Doctrines, New Edition, No. 5, pp. 211-240 (in Persian(.
Mouzanzadegan, Hassan Ali; Rahdarpour, Hamed. (2017). “The principle of transparency of law and its place in the judicial procedure of the European Court of Human Rights and Criminal Law of Iran”. Judicial Legal Perspectives, No. 81, pp. 193-220 (in Persian(.
Michucl Olevi and David Nelken. (1996). The corruption of polihes and the polities of corruption Black wellpiblishers.
Noorzad, Mojtabi. (1389). Economic Crimes in Iran's Criminal Law. Tehran: Javadane Publications, Jangal (in Persian(.
Ravasani, Shapur. (1380). “Privatization, Aghazadehs and unfavorable relationship with cartels”. Report magazine, No. 123, pp. 30-38 (in Persian(.
Rahimi-Nejad, Ismail. (2012). A look at the limitations, obstacles and legal shortcomings of controlling economic crimes in Iran, Encyclopedia of Criminal Sciences, (Collection of New Articles in Criminal Sciences). Book II, Tehran: Mizan (in Persian(.
Rezaei, Nahid. (2014). Criminal protection of the privatization process in Iranian law, Shahrekord University Master's thesis, Faculty of Literature and Humanities (in Persian(.
Shafii Sardast, Jafar; Gurji Azandriani, Ali Akbar; Fazli-Nejad, Javad. (2017). “Conceptual distortion of supervision in Iran's legal system”, Administrative Law Quarterly, No. 16, pp. 63-88 (in Persian(.
Taghipour Nasirabadi, Abbas; Aalipour, Hassan. (1401). “Confrontation of Privatization with Corruption in Iran's Economy, Evaluating the Effectiveness of Preventive Supervision”. Haqq Economic Encyclopaedia, New Volume, 29 (21), pp. 267-231 (in Persian).