Civil Liability of IoT Manufacturer and Service Provider; A Comparative Study in the Laws of the European Union, the United States and Iran

Document Type : Scientific Research

Authors

1 PhD Student, Private Law, Faculty of Law, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

2 Professor, Private Law, Faculty of Law, Payame Noor University, Tehran, Iran.

Abstract

The importance of the civil liability of product manufacturer and Internet of Things service provider is caused by the emerging damages of the Internet of Things to consumers. The integration of hardware, software and service in the Internet of Things is a product that is a continuous goods and service at the same time. The approach of the laws and judicial procedure of the European Union, the United States and Iran are almost the same whether software is a good or a service. In the mentioned legal systems, the basis of the civil liability of the producer of the Internet of Things product is Strict liability, and the basis of the civil liability of the provider of the Internet of Things service is Negligence. Due to the special type of Internet of Things product, on the basis of Strict liability, the element of Negligence in civil liability lawsuits is removed and it is enough to prove the Causal Link by the consumer. Malfunction of the Internet of Things device causes life and financial damage to the consumer and unauthorized access and misuse of personal data. The producer and the Internet of Things service provider are responsible for paying the damage caused to the consumer and any other person who is harmed by the consumption of the goods. Due to the inadequacy of the laws, Iran's laws in the field of civil liability of product manufacturer and Internet of Things service provider need to be legislated.

Keywords

Main Subjects

References

  1. ایرانشاهی، علیرضا؛ محمودی، اصغر؛ ملکی، حسین (1401). «مبنای مسئولیت مدنی اینترنت اشیا»، فصلنامه تحقیقات حقوقی ویژه­نامه حقوق و فناوری، دوره 25، صص 245-219.

    بادینی، حسن (1391). «نقدی بر مبنا و قلمرو مسئولیت مدنی عرضه کنندگان کالاها و خدمات در قانون حمایت از حقوق مصرف کنندگان مصوب 1388»، مجله تحقیقات حقوقی، شماره 58، صص7 - 48.

    سلیمی، فضه؛ پارساپور، محمدباقر (1391). «مبانی مسئولیت مدنی عرضه­کننده در مقابل مصرف­کننده (مطالعه تطبیقی در قانون حمایت از حقوق مصرف­کنندگان و حقوق اتحادیه اروپایی)»، مجله پژوهش­های حقوق تطبیقی، صص 55-75.

    سند الزامات حاکم بر اینترنت اشیا در شبکه ملی اطلاعات مصوب 3/07/1397.

    صفایی، سیدحسین؛ رحیمی، حبیب­الله (1395). مسئولیت مدنی (الزامات خارج از قرارداد). تهران: سازمان مطالعه و تدوین کتب علوم انسانی دانشگاه­ها (سمت).

    ــــــــــــــــ (1397). مسئولیت مدنی تطبیقی. تهران: مؤسسه مطالعات و پژوهش­های حقوقی شهر دانش.

    صفایی، سیدحسین؛ شعبانی کندسری، هادی (1394). «مبنای مسئولیت مدنی تولیدکنندگان کالا و ارائه­دهندگان خدمات؛ مطالعه تطبیقی در حقوق ایران، اسلام، آمریکا و اتحادیه اروپا»، فصلنامه پژوهش تطبیقی حقوق اسلام و غرب، سال دوم، شماره چهارم، صص 43-66.

    قانون تجارت الکترونیک ایران، مصوب 1382.

    قانون حمایت از حقوق مصرف­کنندگان، مصوب 1388.

    قانون حمایت از مصرف­کنندگان خودرو ایران، مصوب 1386.

    قانون مدنی ایران، مصوب 1314.

    قانون مسئولیت مدنی ایران، مصوب 1339.

    کاتوزیان، ناصر (1387). «محدودیت­های آزادی قراردادی بر مبنای حمایت از مصرف­کننده»، فصلنامه حقوق مجله دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، دوره 38، شماره3، صص 327-342.

    ـــــــــــــــ (1389). الزام­های خارج از قرارداد (مسئولیت مدنی). تهران: انتشارات دانشگاه تهران، جلد 1.

    Alan Butler, (2017). "Products Liability And The Internet Of (Insecure) Things: Should Manufacturers Be Liable For Damage Caused By Hacked Devices?", University of Michigan Journal of Law Reform, Forthcoming, pp. 101-118.

    Alexander H. Tran, (2017). "The Internet of Things and Potential Remedies in Privacy Tort Law", Columbia Journal of Law and Social Problems, pp. 263-298.

    Bao Kham Chau, Zane Markel, Danielle Man, (2015)." Liability for Home Iot", Written Under the Guidance of Hal Abelson, Daniel Weitzner, And MIT’s 6.805 Course Staff, pp. 1-31.

    Barbara J. Evans and Frank Pasquale, (2020). "Product Liability Suits For Fda-Regulated Ai/Ml Software", Brooklyn Law School, Legal Studies Paper No. 656,  pp. 1-15.

    Benjamin C. Dean, (2018). "An Exploration of Strict Products Liability and the Internet of Things", Center for Democracy & Technology, pp. 1-21.

    Bethany A. Corbin, (2019). "When “Things” Go Wrong: Redefining Liability For The Internet Of Dical Things", South Carolina Law Review, Vol. 71, No. 1, pp. 1-45.

    Cary Silverman, Phil Goldberg & Jonathan Wilsont, Shook, Hardy & Bacon L.L.P, (2017). "Torts of the Future", Addressing the Liability and Regulatory Implications of Emerging  Technologies, pp.1-93.

    Chatzinikolaou Argyro (2017). Professional Liability For Software Engineers Is It A Viable Choice?, Master Thesis, Llm Law & Technology, Tilburg University.

    Directive (EU) 2019/770 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the supply of digital content and digital services (‘DCD’).

    Directive (EU) 2019/771 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 May 2019 on certain aspects concerning contracts for the sale of goods (‘SGD’).

    Eu Product Liability Directive (Directive 85/374/Eec)

    Eu Consumer Rights Directive (Directive 2011/83/EU)

    European Commission (2020). "Report on The Safety and Liability Implications of Artificial Intelligence, The Internet of Things and Robotics". Report from The Commission to The European Parliament, The Council and The European Economic and Social Committee, pp. 1-18.

    European Commission (Commission Staff Working Document), (2016). "Advancing the Internet of Things in Europe", Accompanying the Document Communication from The Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions, Digitising European Industry Reaping the Full Benefits of A Digital Single Market, Brussels, pp. 1-28.

    European Union (Expert Group on Liability and New Technologies New Technologies Formation) (2019). "Liability for Artificial intelligenceand Other Emerging Digital Technologies", pp. 1-70.

    Federica Giovanella, (2020)."Can ‘Things’ Be Defective Products? The Applicability of the Product Liability Directive to The Internet of Things", European Journal of Consumer Law, University of Udine, pp. 589-611.

    General Product Safety Directive (2001/95/EC)

    Geraint Howells, Christian Twigg-Flesner (2021)."Interconnectivity And Liability: Ai and The Internet of Things", Larry Di Matteo Et.Al. Artificial Intelligence: Global Perspectives on Law & Ethics, Forthcoming, pp. 179- 199.

    Guido Noto La Diega and Ian Walden (2016). "Contracting for the 'Internet of Things': looking into the Nest", European Journal of Law and Technology. Queen Mary School of Law Legal Studies Research Paper No. 219/2016 Vol 7, No 2, pp. 1-29.

    Helene Cahen V. Toyota Motor Corp., No. 16-15496 (9th Cir. 2017)

    1. Royce Fichtner Drake & Troy J. Strader (2022). "Will Products Liability Litigation Help Protect Iot Users from Cyber-Physical Attacks?" Journal of International Technology and Information Management, Volume 31, issue 1, Article 3, pp. 79-96.

    Jeremey de Beer, Jules Belanger, Mohit Sethi (2020). "Consumer Contracts, Copyright Licensing, and Control over Data on the Internet of Things". Canadian Journal of Law and Technology, Vol. 18, No. 2, pp. 161- 211.

    Leta Gorman, (2017). "The Era of the Internet of Things: Can Product Liability Laws Keep Up?", Defense Counsel Journal. pp. 1-9.

    Lucas M. Amodio (2021). "The Intersection of Product Liability Law and The Internet of Things", Boston College Intellectual Property & Technology Forum, pp. 1-26.

    Magrine V. Krasnica, 94 N.J. Super. 228, 227 A.2d 539 (Hudson County Ct. 1967)2. Silverhart V. Mount Zion Hosp., 20 Cal. App. 3d 1022, 98 Cal Rptr. 187 (1971) 3. Carmichael V. Reitz, 17 Cal. App. 3d 958, 95 Cal. Rptr. 381 (1971).

    Michael Chatzipanagiotis, (2020). "Product Liability Directive and Software Updates of Automated
    Vehicles", Department of Law University of Cyprus, pp. 1-5.

    OECD, (2018). "Consumer Product Safety in The Internet of Things", Oecd Digital Economy Papers, pp. 1-32.

    Rebecca Crootof, (2018). "An Internet of Torts [First Draft]".

    Rebecca Crootof, (2019). "The Internet of Torts: Expanding Civil Liability Standards to Address Corporate Remote Interference Address Corporate Remote Interference", Law Faculty Publications, University of Richmond - School of Law, pp. 583- 667.

    Restatement (Second) of Torts (1965).   

    Restatement (Third) of Torts: Products Liability.

    Sabbath Mvula (2020). Liability of the manufacturer or software developer under the Product Liability Directive for defective software that cause a self-driving car to cause damage. LLM in Law & Technology. Master Thesis. Tilburg University.

    SAS Inst., Inc. v. World Programming Ltd., No. 5:10-25-FL, 2016 WL 3435196, at 10 (E.D.N.C. June 17, 2016).

    Stacy-Ann Elvy, (2017). "Hybrid Transactions and the Internet of Things: Goods, Services, or Software?", Washington and Lee Law Review, Vol. 74, Issue 1, pp. 77-172.

    Stahlecker v. Ford Motor Co., 667 N.W.2d 244 (Neb. 2003).

    Uniform Commercial Code (Ucc)o

    William R. Russell, (1972). "Products and the Professional: Strict Liability in the Sale-Service Hybrid Transaction", Hastings Law Journal, Vol. 24, Issue 1, pp. 111- 132.

     

Files

Share

How to cite

Statistics