Document Type : Scientific Research

Authors

• مهدی کریمیان راوندی Karimianravandi ¹
• Ghasem Mohammadi ²

¹ Graduated with a Doctorate in Private Law, Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

² Assistant Professor of the Faculty of Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

Abstract

The fact that, nowadays, private law evolutions have contributed to reciprocal impact of contracts is a inevitable issue and even in law- based terms, it pinpoints the question of why and how such an interaction? which is in conflict with law-based principles should be ever mentioned? In this regard, in local law the key challenge is that, in some cases, the formation and co-existence of contracts have created the development of the compound of same-weight contracts phenomenon of a contract regardless of private law, and this has led to the ignorance of common rules. However, this condition is unavoidable in several contracts in the fields of foreign transaction Oil and petroleum contractors, competition and international refereeing. On this account, the main obsession of this article is to prove the difficulty of accepting contractual groups in Iran, s law due to conceptual ambiguity, its contradiction with defined contracts organization, disability in the application of law principles and the inefficiency of legal justifications. The results of this text are related to the necessity of vivid differentiation between application of contractual group in local law and the international one.

Keywords

• Economic Solidarity
• Legal Identification
• Coexistence of Contracts
• Compulsory Contract
• Contract Group

Main Subjects

• حقوق مدنی