Document Type : Scientific Research
Authors
1 Ph.D. in Private Law, Faculty of Law, University of Qom, Qom, Iran
2 Associate Professor, Department of Private Law, Qom University, Qom, Iran
Abstract
Group legislation is a tool to formulate micro-claims in a collective way. until the claim is left unanswered and public confidence in the judiciary will be strengthened. this tool by reducing costs, optimal use of time and efficiency of the judiciary facilitates people's access to their rights. one of the most important problem of competitive claim is low interest of the people to make a claim. The most effective institution to solve this problem is Group legislation. among the legal systems raised in the field of competition law U.S law system has accepted competitive collective claims. EU paved the way with enacting directive 2014/104/EU. In Iran law system, despite numerous and ambiguous regulations in the case of collective litigation, the Law on the Implementation of general principles of article 44 of the constitution implicitly accepts a collective lawsuit to compensation for competitive losers.
Keywords
پروین، فرهاد (1389). خسارت معنوی در حقوق ایران. چاپ دوم. تهران: انتشارات ققنوس.
حسینینژاد، حسینقلی (1377). مسئولیت مدنی. چاپ دوم. تهران: جهاد دانشگاهی دانشگاه شهید بهشتی.
سلطانی نژاد، هدایت الله (بهار 1395). «بررسی تطبیقی جبران زیان جمعی در نظام حقوقی کامن‌لا و فرانسه و ایران». فصلنامه پژوهشهای حقوق تطبیقی، مقاله 5، دوره 20، شماره 1.
شفائی، علی احسان (1390). دفاع از منافع جمعی در مسئولیت مدنی. رساله دکتری حقوق خصوصی از دانشگاه تهران. استاد راهنما: محسنی مقدم صادق، شماره 47.
شمس، عبدالله (1389). آیین دادرسی مدنی. جلد سوم. تهران: انتشارات دراک.
صفایی، حسین؛ رحیمی، حبیبالله (1389). مسئولیت مدنی (الزامات خارج از قرارداد). تهران: انتشارات سمت.
غفاری فارسانی، بهنام (1393). حقوق رقابت و ضمانت اجراهای مدنی آن. تهران: نشر میزان.
طهماسبی، علی (1393). «مطالعه تطبیقی شرایط دعوای گروهی در حقوق ایران و کانادا، آموزهای برای حقوق ایران». فصلنامه پژوهشهای حقوق تطبیقی، دوره 18، شماره 3.
قاسمی حامد، عباس (1394). حقوق اقتصادی. تهران: انتشارات دراک.
کاتوزیان ناصر (1384). حقوق مدنی: الزامات خارج از قرارداد (ضمان قهری). چاپ 4. تهران: مؤسسه انتشارت و چاپ دانشگاه تهران.
محسنی، حسن و دیگران (1391). «دعاوی جمعی و نقش آن در احقاق حقوق مصرفکنندگان». پژوهش حقوق خصوصی، سال اول، شماره 1.
ناصری، نینا (1392). دعاوی جمعی در نظام حقوقی ایران. استاد راهنما: جواد کاشانی. برای اخذ کارشناسی ارشد از دانشگاه علامه طباطبایی. دانشکده علوم سیاسی.
یزدانیان علیرضا (1379). قلمروی مسئولیت مدنی. چاپ اول. تهران: انتشارات ادبستان.
American Bar Association; Section of Antitrust Law (2010). Antitrust Class Actions Handbook. ABA: Book Publishing.
Anderson, Brian & Trask, Andrew (2010). The Class Action play Book. Oxford University Press
Commission staff working paper accompanying the White paper on damages actions for breach of the EC antitrust rules, SEC (2008). 404, 2.4. pt. 103.
Commission Recommendation of 11 June 2013 on common principles for injunctive and compensatory collective redress mechanisms in the Member States concerning violations of rights granted under Union Law, (2013/396/EU).
Cook, C. (2008). Private Enforcement of EU Competition Law in Member State Courts: Experience to Date and the Path Ahead. 4 Competition Policy International 2.
Diel, Katharine (2010). International Practice: Overview/Comparison of U.S & E.U. Judicial Class Action Structures, Available at: http://www. cpradr.org/about /Newsand Articles/tabid/265/ID/593/International-Practice-Overview Compar ison-of-US-EU-Judicial-Class-Action-Structures-Web.aspx.
Directive 2014/104/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on certain rules governing actions for damages under national law for infringements of the competition law provisions of the Member States and of the European Union [2014] OJ L 349/1.
Driggers S. Martin (1973-1974). Consumer Class Actions under Federal rule 23: Consumer Protection Cause action Available under Federal Statute. South Carolina Law Review. Vol: 25.
Green paper on consumer collective redress, 2008, Consultation on collective redress "Towards a coherent European approach to Collective Redress", February-April 2011 and Frequently asked questions: European Commission recommends collective redress principles to Member States, 2013.
- Miller, Chris (2009). “The Adaptive American Judiciary from Classical Adjuration to Class Action Legislation”. Ably Law Review.Vol: 72. P. 130-132.
Macey, J. and Miller, G. (1991). “The Plaintiffs’ Attorney’s Role in Class Action and Derivative Litigation: Economic Analysis and Recommendations for Reform”. 58 University of Chicago Law Review 1.
Maciejewski, Mariusz (2011). Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy. Review of existing collective redress schemes in EU Member States. IP/A/IMCO/NT/-available at: http://www. europarl.europa.eu /activities /committees/studies.do?language=EN.
Peyer, Sebastian (2014). Compensation and the Damages Directive. Sebastian Peyer Centre for Competition Policy UEA Law School, University of East Anglia, CCP Working Paper.
Piche, C. (2009). “The Cultural Analysis of Class Action Law”. University of Montreal, Lsu Law Center of Civil Law Studies, Vol. 2.
Van den Bergh, R. (2008). Enforcement of Consumer Law by Consumer Associations. In M. Faure and F. Stephen (eds.). Essays in the Law and Economics of Regulation. In Honor of Anthony Ogus (Intersentia, Antwerpen).
Van den Bergh, R. (2013). “Private Enforcement of European Competition Law and the Persisting Collective Action Problem”. 20 Maastricht journal.
Waelbroeck D. (2010). Private Enforcement: Current Situation and Methods of Improvemen’t. in: The reform of EC competition law, ed: I. Lianos, I. Kokkoris, Kluwer Law International.
Wils, Wouter (2005). “The Optimal Enforcement of EC Antitrust Law: A Study in Law and Economics”. Kluwer Law International, Business & Economics.
Woods, D. (2004). “Private enforcement of antitrust rules modernization of the EU rules and the road ahead”. Loyola Consumer Law Review.
Yeazell, Stephen C. (1987). “From Medieval Group Litigation to the Modern Class Action”. New Haven: Yale University Press.
)