Compulsory Counterclaim in Iranian and the U.S Law.

Mansouri Razi, Ayyoub; Heidari, Mohammad

doi:10.30473/clk.2022.42500.2417

Document Type : Scientific Research

Authors

¹ Ph.D. in Private Law, Tehran University, Tehran, Iran

² Ph.D. in Private Law, Shahid Beheshti University, Tehran, Iran

https://doi.org/10.30473/clk.2022.42500.2417

Abstract

In U.S there are two types of counterclaim:compulsory and permissive.In the first one the defendant must submit all the claims arisen out of the transaction or occurrence that is the subject matter of the claimant's claim as counterclaim otherwise his claims would be the subject of res judicata.In Iran by the wording of the article 141 of Civil Procedure submitting the claims arisen out of the same occurrence or transaction or the claims that have complete connection with the main claim as a counterclaim is permissive.Most of commentators view the expression “the same cause” in aforementioned article as unnecessary and useless.Since the reason for consolidation of claims is to avoid conflicting decisions on the same matter and there might be claims arisen out of the same occurrence or transaction still have no connection together. But it seems that above-mentioned expression has an important function.Because making decision on every claim is a consequence of the decision about the occurrence and transaction of which the claim is arisen out.So if claims arisen out of the same occurrence or transaction are submitted in separate cases, that might lead to conflicting decisions.so these type of counterclaims should also be compulsory in Iran.

Keywords

20.1001.1.23221712.1400.10.2.3.0

References

احمدی، خلیل (1394). «مفهوم و آثار عبارات «ارتباط کامل داشتن»، «منوط بودن»، «مربوط بودن» و «هممنشأ بودن» دعاوی در قانون آیین دادرسی مدنی». فصلنامه دیدگاههای حقوق قضایی، شماره 69، صص 66-32.

جعفری لنگرودی، محمدجعفر (1387). ترمینولوژی حقوق. چاپ بیستم. تهران: انتشارات گنج دانش.

حسنی علیرضا؛ بشیری، محسن (1389). «مقایسه تهاتر با
دعوای متقابل در حقوق ایران». نشریه آموزههای حقوقی، دانشگاه علوم اسلامی رضوی، شماره 14، صص 128-115.

شمس، عبداله (1386). آیین دادرسی مدنی. ج 1. تهران: دراگ.

غمامی، مجید (1383). «دعوای متقابل». حقوق، دانشکده حقوق و علوم سیاسی، شماره 66، صص 244-225.

کاتوزیان، ناصر (1386). اعتبار امر قضاوتشده. چاپ هفتم. تهران: میزان.

متین دفتری، احمد (1376). آیین دادرسی مدنی و بازرگانی. ج 1. تهران: آیدا.

محبی، محسن؛ آذری، هادی (1395). «دعوای متقابل در دیوان بینالمللی حقوق دریاها، دستاورد قرار 2 نوامبر 2012 در قضیه کشتی ویرجینیا جی (پاناما/گینه بیسائو)». مجله حقوقی بینالمللی، شماره 55، صص 31-52.

نهرینی، فریدون (1392). ایستایی اجرای حکم دادگاه. چاپ اول. تهران: گنج دانش.

واحدی، جواد (1370). «دعوای متقابل». مجله حقوقی و قضایی دادگستری، شماره 2.

Antonopoulos, C. (2011). The Concept of Counterclaim Before the International Court of Justice. Asser press. Hague, the Netherlands.

Bilyeu Oakley, John, J.; Amar, Vikram (2009). American Civil Procedure: A Guide to Civil Adjudication In US Courts. Kluwer Law International Publishing. The Netherland.

Campbell Black, H. (1968). Black`s law dictionary. (4th ed). West publishing Company.

Canby Jr, William (2015). American Indian law in a Nutshell. 6^th. United States: West Academic publishing.

Clermont, Kevin M. (2004). "Common-Law Compulsory CounterClaim Rule:Creating Effective and elegant Res Judicata Doctrine". Notr dame Law Review, Vol. 79.5, pp. 1745-1760.

Darbee, R. (2010). Personal Jurisdiction as a Defense to the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. McGeorge Law Review , Vol. 41.

Emanuel, Steven, L. (2008). Civil Procedure. (4^th edition). New York: ASPEN Publishers

Fletcher, G.; Sheppard, S. (2005). American Law in a Global Context. The Basics. New York: Oxford University press.

Friedenthal, J. et.al. (1985). Civil procedure. West Publishing. New York: The United State of America. P. 348-349.

Loughlin, P.; Gerlis, S. (2004). civil procedure. (2nd Ed). Cavendish publishing. London: Great Britain.

McFarland, Douglas (2007). "In Search of the Transaction or Occurrence: Counterclaims".Creighton Law Review, Vol. 40, pp. 699-732.

Peterson, Todd David (2008). “The Misguided Law of compulsory counterclaims in default cases available”. Arizona Law Review, Vol. 50:1107, pp. 1107 – 1146.

R.Orr, Justin (2013). "Patent Aggregation: Models, Harms and the Limited Role of Antitrust”. Berkeley Technology Law Journal, Vol. 28:525.

Riano, William B. (2005). Fundamentals of Civil Procedure. Philippines, Rex Printing Company.

Richardson, E.; Milton, R. (1998). Civil Litigation for Paralegals. (2^nd ed). West Publishing. New York: The United State of America.

Segal, Jeffrey A.; Speath, Harold J. and
Benesh, Sara C. (2005). The Supreme Court in the American legal System. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Taruffo, M.; Hazard G. (1993). American civil procedure. Yale University Press. New York: United States.

The American Law Institute (2006). Principles and Rules of Transnational Civil Procedures. New York: Cambridge University Press

Civil Law Knowledge

Compulsory Counterclaim in Iranian and the U.S Law.

References

References

Volume 10, Issue 2 - Serial Number 20
May 2021
Pages 45-56

Compulsory Counterclaim in Iranian and the U.S Law.

References

References

Volume 10, Issue 2 - Serial Number 20May 2021Pages 45-56

Volume 10, Issue 2 - Serial Number 20
May 2021
Pages 45-56