67, 1151-1153.
Abraham, K. S. (1996). A Theory of Insurance Policy Interpretation. MICH.L. REV, 95, 531-538.
Ayres, I., & Gertner, R. (1989). Filling Gaps in Incomplete Contracts: An Economic Theory of Default Rules. YALE L. J., 99(80), 105.
Barak, A. (2005). Purposive Interpretation in Law. (S. Bashi, Trans.) Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Charny, D. (1991). Hypothetical Bargains: The Normative Structure of Contract Interpretation. MICH. L. REV., 89, 1815-1854.
Chetkovich, C. A. (2005). Eating smoke: fire in urban America, 1800-1950. J. of Interdisc. Hist., 36, 106-107.
Cserne, P. (2007). Policy considerations in contract interpretation: the contra proferentem rule from a comparative law and economics perspective. Hungarian Association for Law and Economics, 5. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/peter_cserne/28. 21/10/2016
Cserne, P. (2009). Policy considerations in contract interpretation: the contra proferentem rule from a comparative law and economics perspective. Retrieved from http://works.bepress.com/peter_cserne/28
Horton, D. (2003). Flipping the Script: Contra Proferentem and Standard Form Contracts. University of Colorado L. REV, 80.
Institute, A. L. (1981). The Scope of Contractual Obligations. Restatement (Second) of Contracts 2. St. Paul, Minnesota: American Law Institute Publishers.
Kessler, F. (1943). Contracts of Adhesion Some Thoughts about Freedom of Contract. COLUM. L. REV., 43, 629.
Krampe, C. (1983). Die Unklarheitenregel, Bürgerliches und Römisches Recht. Berlin: Duncker und Humbolt.
Kronman, A. T. (1980). Contract law and distributive justice. Yale L. J.(89), 472-473.
Lewinsohn-Zamir, D. (2006). In Defense of Redistribution Through Private Law. University of Minnesota Law Review, 91(2), 326, 381-390.
Patterson, D. (1993). The Pseudo-Debate Over Default Rules in Contract Law. S. CAL. INTERDISC. L.J, 3, 235-279.
Treitel, G. (1999). Law of Contracts (10th ed.). London: Butterworths.
Vance, W. R. (1911). The History of the Development of the Warranty in Insurance Law. YALE L.J., 20, 524.
Cases
Charles Behlen Sons’ Co. v. Ricketts, 164 N.E. 436, 438 (Ohio Ct. App.)1928).
Southern Ry. Co. v. Coca Cola Bottling Co., 145 F.2d 304, 307 (4th Cir.) 1994).
Gray v. Zurich Ins. Co., 419 P.2d 168, 171 (Cal. 1966).
Neal v. State Farm Ins. Cos., 10 Cal. Rptr. 781, 784 (Ct. App. 1961).
New York, N.H. & H.R.R. v. Nothnagle, 346 U.S. 128, 136 (1953).
Ury v. Jewelers Acceptance Corp., 38 Cal. Rptr. 376, 381 (Ct. App. 1964).
Hamilton v. Stockton Unified School Dist., 54 Cal. Rptr. 463, 467 (Cal. Ct. App. 1966).
Doyle v. Finance America, LLC, 918 A.2d 1266, 1270 n.3 (Md. Ct. App. 2007).
Morgan Stanley v. New England Ins. Co., 225 F.3d 270, 279 (2d Cir. 2000).
St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins. Co. v. MetPath, Inc., 38 F.Supp.2d 1087, 1092 (D. Minn. 1998).
CPS Chemical Co., Inc. v. Continental Ins. Co., 536 A.2d 311, 318 (App. Div. 1988).
Hamwi v. Citinational-Buckeye Inv. Co., 140 Cal. Rtpr. 215, 221 (Cal. Ct. App. 1977).
Carolina Care Plan Inc. v. McKenzie, 467 F.3d 383, 390 (4th Cir. 2006).
Armendariz v. Found. Health Psychcare Servs., 6 P.3d 669, 767 (Cal. 2000).
Scovill v. WSYX/ABC, 425 F.3d 1012, 1017 (6th Cir. 2005).
First National Bank v. Hartford Fire Insurance Co, 95 U.S. 673 (1877)
)